Academic Integrity and Misconduct

Academic integrity is at the heart of our community and reflects a shared set of principles which include honesty, trust, responsibility, fairness, and respect.

As a University student, you are expected to uphold academic integrity and good academic practice at all times, by demonstrating behaviour that is honest and ethical in all of your academic work and conducting all aspects of your academic life in a professional manner.

This involves:

  • taking responsibility for your own work.
  • fully acknowledging the work of others wherever it has contributed to your own.
  • supporting others in their own efforts to behave with academic integrity.
  • following the requirements of the University Policies and Regulations.

Through your work and approach to learning you are expected to demonstrate your development as an independent learner, researcher, and critical thinker, this also means that we expect you not to use we expect you not to use Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT and Microsoft Co-Pilot to generate work unless you have been explicitly told that you may or must do so.

If your Module Leader/Programme Director has made clear that you may or must use Generative AI tools as part your assessed work, then you should acknowledge, describe, and reference its use as instructed. Always check with the Module Leader/Programme Director if you are unclear on what has been authorised.

Using Generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as your own is Academic Misconduct and can have serious consequences.

City St George’s guidelines on the use of Generative AI can be found on the Student Hub: Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for learning

How we define Academic Misconduct

At City St George's, we define academic misconduct as ‘any action that produces or seeks to produce an improper advantage for you in relation to your assessment(s) or deliberately and unnecessarily disadvantages other students’.

Broadly speaking, this is any action which gains, attempts to gain, or assists others in gaining or attempting to gain unfair academic advantage and undermine academic integrity. It includes, but it is not limited to plagiarism, collusion and contract cheating:

  • Plagiarism: using another person’s or Generative AI (such as ChatGPT) ideas, words, data, or other material produced by them without acknowledgement
  • Collusion: working with others and using the ideas or words of this joint work, in part or whole, and passing it off as your own individual efforts, or, where one student has authorised another to use their work, in part or whole, and to submit it as their own
  • Contract Cheating: happens when a third party completes work for a student who then submits it as their own. 'Third parties' include web-based companies or auction sites (essay mills), sharing websites (including essay banks) or an individual such as a lecturer, colleague, friend or relative.

Academic Misconduct can be committed intentionally or accidentally, so please make sure you read and follow the guidance carefully.

The University actively pursues all cases of suspected academic misconduct.

City St George's Students’ Union (SU) have worked with the University, including academic staff from across all Schools, to produce a short video which explains academic integrity, the consequences of academic misconduct and how to avoid misconduct such as plagiarism, collusion and cheating.

Watch the SU Video and view the full SU Academic Integrity and Misconduct Campaign.

How we manage Academic Misconduct

Our Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy sets out the process which is triggered if we suspect that you have not upheld these principles and have committed Academic Misconduct.

Our policy is designed to ensure that students suspected of Academic Misconduct are provided with an independent and transparent system that is both efficient and fair.

This system safeguards the integrity of our awards as well as the interests of the majority of students who work hard for their award through their own efforts.

Avoiding Academic Misconduct

Avoiding Academic Misconduct means upholding your Academic Integrity. This means conducting all aspects of your academic life in a professional manner. It involves:

  • taking responsibility for your own work
  • respecting the rights of other scholars, fully acknowledging the work of others wherever it has contributed to your own to avoid plagiarism
  • ensuring that your own work is reported honestly
  • supporting others in their own efforts to behave with academic integrity
  • avoiding actions which seek to give you an unfair advantage over others
  • following the requirements of the University Assessment Regulations (Senate Regulation 19).

You can find more information about the support available to you during your studies and how to avoid academic misconduct on the CityReady and Academic Skills Moodle page.

Proofreading & AI Grammar Checkers

Proofreading is an important final step when producing any piece of writing. It involves looking for “surface” errors in a text, often concerning spelling, punctuation and grammar. Ideally, you will proofread your work yourself (and advice on how to do this effectively is available via the Academic Skills Team).

However, if you are working on a long piece of text such as a dissertation, you might wish to consider using a proofreader if this is permitted by your academic department. Always check your assignment guidelines if you are unclear on what is allowed.

For full details on Proofreading including information on using AI Grammar checkers, please familiarise yourselves with our ‘Proofreading Student Guidance’. This guidance will explain the appropriate use of human and Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) proofreaders, such as ChatGPT.

City St Georges has clear rules about proofreading and about using Generative AI software in your academic work. You are expected to familiarise yourself with and follow these rules to avoid committing academic misconduct like plagiarism, either accidentally or on purpose.

Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy updates

In August 2025, the Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) policy was updated. If you have not done so yet please take some time to familiarise yourself with the changes to the Policy.

A summary of key AIM policy revisions - August 2025

Types of Academic Misconduct

Contract Cheating

Contract cheating is one of the most serious forms of academic misconduct.

It is defined by the University and the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) as ‘a form of cheating where a student submits work to a for assessment, where they have used one or more of a range of services provided by a third party. Such input is not permitted. The contract with the student can include payment or other favours, but this is not always the case’.

  • 'Services' may include essays or other types of assignments, conducting research, impersonation in exams, translation into English and other forms of unfair assistance for completing assessed work.
  • 'Third parties' include web-based companies or auction sites (Essay Mills), sharing websites (including essay banks), or an individual such as a lecturer, colleague, friend or relative, or  Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or other Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bots.
  • 'Input' means that the third party contributes to the work of the student, such that there is reasonable doubt as to whose work the assessment represents.

LLMs and AI Bots, such as chatbots like ChatGPT, can generate responses to quite complex questions and these technologies are developing rapidly. Use of Chatbots or other AI applications, even if they are freely available, is a form of contract cheating because you are instructing a third party to complete the work for you.

Please note, some assessment tasks may be designed to incorporate using such tools as part of the assessment. Providing you are following exactly what has been requested by your School this is acceptable and will not be considered contract cheating. Your school will make clear if you can use artificial intelligence as part of an assessment process.

What are Essay Mills?

Essay Mills are businesses that allow customers to commission an original piece of writing on a particular topic so that they may commit academic fraud. Essay Mills make supposed promises about the standard of work that is commissioned and charge money per page/number of words. These sites may also offer ‘plagiarism checkers’, which may not be as reliable as claimed.

How might I be targeted by Essay Mills?

Essay Mills try to profit from the anxiety students may face because of the pandemic. They rely on exploitation and aggressive marketing and may reach out to you in a number of different ways including:

  1. Reaching students at the right time such as at the middle and end of their terms. They target students with advertising and discounts via email or pop-up ads to order an assignment “just in time”.
  2. Shopping around: Essay Mills have also started crafting entire networks of potential essay sites to give students the sense that they are shopping for the “best match” when really there is one master essay business at the core.
  3. Offering a “professional” and personalised experience. including posting university logos on their websites without permission to appear official.
  4. Following up with perseverance using your contact information to relentlessly contact you via email, text and social media at key points in the academic year.

What do I do if I am targeted?

Essay Mills will often disguise themselves as ‘proofreading’, ‘tutorial’ and ‘academic support’ services. They may target you via email, text, pop-up ads and social media. If you receive this marketing you must:

  • Delete it immediately
  • Do not use click though links 
  • Do not offer any personal information or contact details

Academic support services, including study tips, proofreading and tutorials are all offered in- house by City. Useful links and contacts on how to access our services, can be found in the ‘Support available for me’ section below.

Could I be blackmailed by Essay Mills?

Yes. The moment someone starts threatening you in an attempt to get a demand met or financial gain, that’s blackmail and it is a very serious crime. Essay Mills demand payment and have been known to blackmail people who use the service or who start to use the service but change their mind. If you have used an Essay Mill and find yourself being blackmailed, you should:

  • not pay any money
  • stop all contact
  • keep all the evidence
  • seek help (report it to the Police, contact Victim Support on 0808 16 89 111)
  • talk to someone you trust (for example the Students’ Union or someone in your School such as your Module Leader or your Personal Tutor)

Am I likely to get caught if I Contract Cheat?

Yes. Universities have developed several strategies to combat this type of academic misconduct including using anti-plagiarism software such as Turnitin and accessing large databases of known assignments sold to students by Essay Mills which we have access to and can check your work against.

What happens if I am found guilty of using Essay Mills or Contract Cheating?

The consequences of contract cheating are very serious. Contract Cheating and the use of Essay Mills is defined by the University as Severe Academic Misconduct.

Where there is no hard evidence of contract cheating, but it has been demonstrated that there are good reasons to believe that the work is not your own, it may be deemed appropriate for the investigating staff or the Academic Misconduct Panel to expect you to demonstrate that the work is your own original work.

This may be involve but is not limited to an Academic Integrity Viva. An Academic Integrity Viva will involve the investigating staff asking for draft copies of the work and/or asking a series of questions about the content of the submitted work.

If you are found to have committed contract cheating and/or have been using Essay Mills, you are likely to be referred to a Disciplinary Panel as an outcome of the academic misconduct process.

The outcome is often expulsion from the University as it includes an element of deception/fraud.

How to avoid contract cheating

The Students’ Union website offers information on Academic integrity and contract cheating: the pitfalls of paying someone to do your studies for you.

With the increased response to COVID-19 there has been a notable spike in aggressive contract cheating marketing. To stay aware of what this is and how to avoid it, please familiarise yourself with the definition of contract cheating from the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) by reading our Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Guidance.

Collusion

Collusion involves working together with other students on a piece of work that will be submitted for individual assessment.

This includes via digital channels such as text and email as well as via online platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram etc. (including the sharing of screenshots and photographs).

This is not permitted and can result in an accusation of academic misconduct for all the students involved

How to avoid collusion

The Students' Union offers useful general advice, guidance and support including information on ‘Collaboration vs Collusion’.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is defined as use of intellectual material produced by another person without acknowledging its source, for example:

  • Wholesale copying of passages from works of others without acknowledgment.
  • Use of the views, opinions, or insights of another without acknowledgment.
  • Submitting an assignment prepared by another student as your own

Where there is no hard evidence of plagiarism, but it has been demonstrated that there are good reasons to believe that the work is not your own, it may be deemed appropriate for the investigating staff or the Academic Misconduct Panel to expect you to demonstrate that the work is your own original work.

This may be involve but is not limited to an Academic Integrity Viva. An Academic Integrity Viva will involve the investigating staff asking for draft copies of the work and/or asking a series of questions about the content of the submitted work.

Self-Plagiarism

It is possible to plagiarise yourself by re-using work you have previously submitted* without acknowledgement.

If you do re-use work from a previous assignment, this should not normally be more than a short quotation, as the same work cannot be submitted for different assignments.

*This does not include any re-submissions of work for the same assignment which have been approved by your lecturer/tutor.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Generative AI is a broad label that's used to describe any type of artificial intelligence (AI) that can be used to create new text, images, video, audio, code or synthetic data.

One of the tools that has risen to prominence recently is ChatGPT by OpenAI which uses a chatbot interface for users to engage with the system; however, there are other tools available, including those embedded in search engines and computer coding editors.

Like other universities, City is exploring the opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI. Whilst we will not prohibit the use of generative AI, it is important that AI is not used to falsely pass off academic work generated by AI as a student’s own work.

If your module leader has given you instructions on the use of AI for a particular assessment, you should follow these. In the absence of any such specific instructions, the key point is that when you hand in work for an assessment, you are stating that it is your own original work.

The purpose of any assessment is to measure what you have learnt and understood from the course being assessed. It is not possible to assess your understanding if you plagiarise, copy and paste text, use AI, paraphrasing software or essay mills.

Our guidance for students is outlined on the Student Hub: Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for learning

Plagiarism and TurnItIn Checks

Please be aware that TurnItIn is a multi-institutional platform. This means that any assessment uploaded to TurnItIn will be stored in one repository regardless of who uploaded it and which Institution it was uploaded from.

Uploading your work to TurnItIn via another institution log in or via another City student or a student from another University will not prevent a plagiarism match once you submit your final assessment.

TurnItIn will match the final submission to the one submitted previously, and an academic misconduct investigation will be instigated. In order to avoid an investigation and a possible sanction being applied to your work, please do not upload your assessment to TurnItIn via any log in, unless explicit permission to do so has been given to you by your School.

If you are unclear or have any questions, please speak with your personal tutor first.

For more definitions of types of Academic Misconduct please see Appendix 1 of our Academic Integrity and Misconduct Guidance.

Allegation Reporting Tool

Allegation Reporting is speaking up about actual or potential Academic Misconduct or Severe Academic Misconduct that you have seen or know about whilst at University.

It is necessary for someone who submits an Allegation Report to have ‘direct experience’, this means that you have personally seen, heard, or experienced the events, evidence or behaviour in question, rather than relying on second-hand information or what others have told you (hearsay).

We encourage you to raise any concerns and submit any evidence (where available) regarding suspected or known potential Academic Misconduct or Severe Academic Misconduct using our online Academic Misconduct Allegation Reporting Tool. You can do this anonymously, if you wish.

For full guidance on using the Tool, please see our User Guide.

All concerns raised will be reviewed and where appropriate, a Preliminary Investigation process will be launched.

Please be aware that if you choose to make a report anonymously and do not provide any evidence, we will not be able to take any action as a result. However, data from anonymous reports may be used to identify patterns of incidences so that we can further enhance our academic integrity support services.

Useful resources

The Students' Union offers useful general advice, guidance and support. The Union Advice service is independent from the University and they can:

  • Explain the academic misconduct regulations and process.
  • Advise you on responding to the allegations.
  • Advise on how to put together a statement to respond to the allegations.
  • Accompany you to meetings or panels with your School.
  • Provide ongoing advice throughout the process.

If you need any further support throughout your assessments and studies, please also remember that staff in your School and in our Student Support Services are here for you.

Merging City and St George’s Resources

As we bring together resources for City (Clerkenwell) and St George’s (Tooting) students, some content may be specific to one campus and not the other. For the most relevant information, try using specific keywords or exploring content related to your department. If you need help, our support teams are available to guide you.

Clerkenwell students can contact campus.news@citystgeorges.ac.uk
Tooting students can contact studentlifecentre@sgul.ac.uk.